On Tue, 2005-12-07 at 09:38 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote: > > >Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > > > > >>If you want bugs to be > >>addressed, Fedora Bugzilla is the right place for that. > >> > >> > > > >That reminds me - time to take the monthly look at my bugzilla, > >at <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=160940> > >======================================= > >Bugzilla Bug 160940 ? > >anaconda bombs out on Sony Picturebook while "Reading package information" > >======================================= > > > >No, no progress. > >Might as well have written to the Pope. > > > > > So, you have complaints about the Pope as well? Or at least > it seems so. I thought it was a compliment, he seemed to have expectation of getting at least some kind of an answer. > > [snip] > > >Also the way the bugzilla site is arranged is like something out of the ark. > >Someone ought to ask themselves, > >"Is this the best way of organising a bug-reporting site? > >Will people find it simple to report bugs? > >Will people find it simple to search through the site." > > > >As far as I am concerned, the answer is "No. No. No." > > > > > Yes, I have found bugzilla difficult to navigate. > > If you really are having such a terrible time, then you probably > need not to use FC4. The decision to put it on your machine was > made by one man. That same man has decided to let FC4 remain > on his machine. That man is the only one who can put something > else on it. > > Mike That's it, tell everyone to get lost and there will be nobody using it.
