On Tue, 2005-12-07 at 00:46 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Stefan Held wrote:
>
> >Am Montag, den 11.07.2005, 19:39 -0400 schrieb Steven W. Orr:
> >
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> >I suspect either Selinux or udev. Btw last week was a bank robery.
> >Nobody knows who is responsible. I suspect gcc also for that.
> >
> >
> Sarcasm like this really doesn't look well on the one who uses it.
>
> BTW, I had considered upgrading to FC4 from FC2, but reconsidered
> after watching here for about a month.
>
> I don't like this guy's tone much, either. But I decided against FC4 for
> basically the reasons he gave.
>
Agreed after fighting it out over problems with the last release,
I figured I'd sit this one out for a while and watch everyone else
get bashed around. From what I can tell FC4 was released with a
number of problems that are show stoppers for some, irritants for
others but don't affect some people at all.
I have yet to see a developer say :
Oops, I must have missed that one, please do <this> and reply back
with the results, so I can get right on it for you.
Unfortunately, we're just here to do the QA and provide
entertainment for the developers when the feel like steam rolling
someone.
> [snip]
>
> >Come on, be specific. I cannot use my Washing Machine at all. So now let
> >us blame Fedora for it.
> >
> >
> >
> Makes you look sillier than him.
>
> FC4 looks too unstable for me at present, as well. I'll wait until some
> dust
> settles. But I'm sure things will get worked out.
>From the way the developers talk, you would think this is
the rawhide list. I thought FC was supposed to be a step
above rawhide not the same catagory. I also though FC was
supposed to be STABLE but with frequent revisions, not
unusable except in specific situations.
>
> Mike
>
> --
> p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
> I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
