Deron Meranda <deron.meranda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Okay, I think the "don't install on production systems" point has been > made loud enough. Let's not forget that there is no magic line which > separates production servers from playboxes. Some uses will be in > that gray area, where it's not quite production or mission critical, > but it still gives you grief if it breaks. There's a whole continuous > range of "importance", and that's the call of the user/administrator, > which I'm sure Steven is well aware of now. Where you fall in that gray area should determine how cautious you are towards upgrades. My home machine is important to me in that if Linux doesn't run some task my alternative is to boot WinME, which is getting more and more painful. I'm still waiting to upgrade to FC4 for the simple reason that I expect things to get broken on a new release and that major problems get fixed or documented over the first few months. Problems are going to crop up whenever Fedora goes from Test (run on a relatively small number of systems) to Core (with people running around trying to get early downloads and torrents). Maybe that should be made clearer to users: the speed you upgrade will directly affect the time it will take to iron out problems. That said I think an all caps warning against upgrading based on one users bad experiences is a little alarmist. -- imalone
