Ken Rambler wrote:
I'm sorta the new FC kid on the block and a little confused. The last
version I used was RH9, very stable. How does FC3 and FC4 compare?
Which would be best for a production server?
All these comments have me on guard :-)
-----Original Message-----
*From:* fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Fred Morcos
*Sent:* Monday, July 11, 2005 8:28 PM
*To:* For users of Fedora Core releases
*Subject:* Re: WARNING:DO NOT UPGRADE TO CORE 4
well, im not against steven, fc3 is way much better than fc4.. i
still experience hell a lot of problems in fc4 even after
upgrading the whole system.. i dont know why all this happened, is
it such bad testing? or the fedora team giving up on the project??
things/problems that happen aren't suppose to be happening.. i
mean, fedora core 4 till now cant be a usable system anywhere
(home, office, server, etc..)
no offence but i think that fc4 needs a lot more attention for the
next 2 months to get everything tested, fixed and optimized as
good as possible...
im wishing them good luck
-fred
Are these short lines? They sure got rewrapped for me.
One thing to bear in mind is that the FCx series is
what we used to call beta test.
Alpha test - first testing done, by the engineers
who created the product.
Beta test - second testing done, by the customers
not yet into acceptance.
So, you pays your money and you takes what you gets.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
