At 3:23 PM -0500 7/11/05, Mike McCarty wrote: >Tony Nelson wrote: > >>At 9:15 AM -0500 7/11/05, Mike McCarty wrote: ... >>>Please use shorter lines. >>> >>> >> >>You keep telling people that, yet when I look at the original messages >>their "lines" are always standard length. How short do you want them to be? >> >> >Odd. I've seen lines which look like they are over 180 characters long. >Perhaps my mailer is reformatting the text on the way in. Usually I like >lines not much more than 70 chars, shorter better to prevent quotes >overflowing. > >You know much about Thunderbird? If so, reply via separate >e-mail, and maybe you can give me some help in that regard. No, can't help you there, but just to make sure that I wasn't spouting nonsense, I checked a couple of the messages you made that complaint about, and I see no sign that the text was sent unwrapped. (Resized the window, which resizes the text if it is being wrapped locally; make replies and noted that each line had a ">", instead of just one on the front when lines are wrapped locally.) I also can't reply to you directly, as your server rejects my mail. ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>