Am Di, den 05.07.2005 schrieb Andreas Wahlert um 11:34: > ok i try to answer without flaming :-) Thanks for the answer :) > I'm realy not a fan of ISA, but if you have only M$ Servers behind it > and the local admin's are not realy experts in firewalling, it's an > comfortable product. Does the local admin need to be a firewall expert? Normally there is not much need to fluently change firewalling rules. > You can route to several internal http Servers in considuration of the > hostheaders. You have an outlook RPC Filter (uuuhhhhh). The Proxy is > integrated in AD an so on. I see the money cows ;) > OK OK. If it's possible i use ipfw or iptables too, but sometimes there > are customers, that want to use M$ only. :-( iptables (Linux) or ipfilter (FreeBSD) or PF (OpenBSD / FreeBSD) are pretty powerful. > Andreas Back to your initial question: as neither Asterisk is an application designed on or with Fedora (any repository having it packaged? don't know any) and especially the M$ ISA product being non FOSS you are better asking your question on the Asterisk mailing list or on any M$ forum. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 12:01:42 up 9 days, 18:53, load average: 0.20, 0.17, 0.11
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
