Re: chmod broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Markku Kolkka wrote:
Bill Rees kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika torstai, 30. kesäkuuta 2005 21:47):
Markku Kolkka wrote:
"Only a process whose effective user ID matches the user ID
of the file, or a process with the appropriate privileges,
shall be permitted to change the file mode bits of a file."
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/chmo
d.html
Then what's the point of groups?


They allow the _owner_ to grant a limited number of users more rights to a file than the whole world gets. If group members could chmod the file, what would be the point of the file owner?

I see your point and agree though if you can remove or overwrite the file I don't see how chmod not performing is really going to help. Though for read only files they will stay that way.

Anyway, thanks for putting up with this.
bill


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux