Mike McEldowney wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I agree with the sentiment about diversity. No one size fits all. I
like the
way Firefox is more adaptable than IE. More of the features can be
"customized". But you know something? Not all features even deserve
to exist. IMO, tabbed browsing is one of them. Not the best feature ever
dreamed up. I'd like all the features to be configurable, even
disableable.
It would be nice NOT TO HAVE TABS AT ALL.
I myself LOVE tabs in my browser. I believe that tabbed browsing is
one of the best features ever developed in a browser. I also use
tabbed consoles extensively on my machine. Why would I want multiple
windows of the same application taking up system resources when I can
tab them and navigate faster with less system strain? Not to mention
that when I want the console or browser out of the way to do something
else, I don't have to minimize multiple windows, just one.
Did you read what I wrote? I am asking for more ability to customize.
And why should having multiple instances of an application running take
up more resources? I happen not to like tabbed browsing. You do.
Fine. How about a system that allows features to be disabled? Is that
too much to ask?
So, it seems to me, that your own prejudices are showing a little bit.
<flame on>
Really? And yours aren't? Customization allows us to change the
software to meet our specific wants and prejudices.
I didn't say that mine weren't. Of course mine are.
(snip)
I find that I'm frequently
accidentally doing things with the mouse because I can't just disable
"features".
And I bet you would prefer your car ran on rails so that you'd stop
running into things after you disable that stupid steering wheel.
Flames definitely not needed, appreciated, or useful.
<flame off>
All that said, I do agree that turning features off should also be an
option. If you don't like tabs, you should be able to turn them off.
If you don't want to click with your middle button, you should be able
to turn it off. If you can program and can donate the time, you
should consider helping add those options to those projects.
Hum. So. You flame me, but agree.
Have a great day!
The sentiment seems a little hollow, given your tone.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
