better for what? ;)) I personally am a fan of fast release cycles. Sure for a production box its different.. but then again no one forces an end user to upgrade to every release. If the cycles become too long its not good for having new core components in (like python gnome etc etc etc). If you think thats good or bad usually depends on the purpose... i am more or less developer and i dont want to use/test/bugreport etc vs old versions. If theres nothing planned in the next nine months that would make a new distro release a requirement i am fine with it however. ;) regards, Rudolf Kastl p.s. i am using fedora cause its a bleeding edge distro ;) 2005/6/29, Martín Marqués <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > El Mié 29 Jun 2005 16:19, Elliot Lee escribió: > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Captain Bubudiu wrote: > > > > > Yep dudes according to > > > http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/ FC5 is > > > out in Feb 2006 preliminally. > > > > > > However with my FC3 boxes working like clockwork i > > > will be knocking butts with most of you in Jan 2006 > > > with the release of FC6. Fedora now has a healthier 9 > > > month cycle. > > > > Be aware that this is a one time thing (and subject to change). > > > > Once we get a few more details nailed down, I'll send out an announcement. > > Excelent! 9 months is much better!!! > > -- > 17:47:09 up 23 days, 5:33, 1 user, load average: 1.72, 1.21, 0.84 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Martín Marqués | select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' > Centro de Telematica | DBA, Programador, Administrador > Universidad Nacional > del Litoral > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
