Am Mi, den 29.06.2005 schrieb Ovidiu Lixandru um 20:29: > Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > Am Mi, den 29.06.2005 schrieb Ovidiu Lixandru um 20:09: > <snip> > > Sorry to say, but this is the wrong auditorium for Red Hat Linux 9 > > issues. > > I didn't know who else to ask. fedora-legacy-list seems to have another > purpose than user problems with projects in Legacy. Correct. But with RH9 you fall into the gap. > > O man, that old kernel is long. long time obsolete and a no-go for a > > firewalling router! Have a close look at the Fedora Legacy Project. > > I know, however it serves its purpose and it's a nicely tweaked machine. > I don't really want to go upgrading. Besides, old bits of software have > their charm. ;) I really hope all the other software is not that badly maintained like the kernel (I don't mean that aggressive - just as a serious warning). > > Migrate to Fedora - then you are right here (or get RHEL or CentOS and > > use their communication routes). > > I've backported some of the packages from FC1 and FC2, but the core is > still Shrike. Is this a "if it works, it's high time for an upgrade" > trick question? :) It is said with respect to my first sentence in this mail; please see above. You are mostly on your own speaking about end user problems with RH9. > So, does anyone have any pointers for software filtering using 2.4 kernels? Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 20:43:44 up 4 days, 3:35, load average: 0.11, 0.12, 0.14
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
