Am Mi, den 29.06.2005 schrieb Randall Shaw um 17:39: > FC3.i386 > > Today I finally got tired of using a very wimpy, thin VI editor than I am > used too. Our other servers run a vi editor that has all sorts of features, > some of which I love, being the autocmd's and coloring. > Ok... So it DID install, but then why is there an old 'vi' still lingering, > and it wasn¹t changed with the new code? There are people who only want vi and not the shiny things you like with vim. > I guess I am confused by this program and how it is supposed to be > installed. I would have figured yum put the files in the right place, and > adjust what needed to be adjusted for it to work as expected. > > So... What could I do at this point? Do I simply "mv /usr/bin/vim /bin/vi" ? > Or is that like the worst thing I could do, hehehe. Or, worst yet... Retrain > my fingers to type "vim" instead of "vi" ?? OMG NO! No, please do not do that (moving vim over vi binary. > -Randall Shaw $ rpm -qf /etc/profile.d/vim.sh vim-enhanced-6.3.054-0.fc3.1 cat /etc/profile.d/vim.sh if [ -n "$BASH_VERSION" -o -n "$KSH_VERSION" -o -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then # for bash, pdksh and zsh, only if no alias is already set alias vi >/dev/null 2>&1 || alias vi=vim fi If vim-enhanced is installed, then vi is an alias to vim, so that when entering "vi" you will get "vim" with all the bells and whistles. Well, you have to re-login so that the profile is read in. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 17:54:12 up 4 days, 46 users, load average: 0.18, 0.39, 0.42
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
