Am Di, den 28.06.2005 schrieb Scot L. Harris um 19:35: > > > Isn't it 137, 138 UDP and 139 and 445 TCP? > > > > > Scot L. Harris > > > > Hehe, now you got me :) Scot, you are right. Sometimes it is better to > > not give such information out of head but to look at the documentation: > > No gotcha intended. :) > > I thought I might have been setting things wrong. Personally I have > never seen consistent response when trying to use nautilius to browse > windows shares from linux. I feel that is something nasty with nautilus or gnome-vfs(2)-smb. Many people share that experience. I face that too on my workstation where no iptables rules are active (my BSD router runs PF). > Should udp and tcp be opened up for all of those ports? As far as I know it is sufficient to open port 137 and 138 UDP only and ports 139 and 445 TCP only. > Scot L. Harris Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 19:46:40 up 3 days, 2:38, load average: 0.12, 0.21, 0.22
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
