Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Now both Fedora Core and Extras falls under the same legal and > idealogical design of being a platform made up completely of Free and > open source software. This leaves in some gaps like mp3 and DVD > decrypting capability (legal limitations) along with other proprietary > software managed by the Livna repository which is developed in sync and > compatible with Fedora but not officially supported by the Fedora project. > > Hopefully that clears it up Almost. (1) I take it that fedora.us is identical (or nearly identical?) to Fedora Extras ? In that case, would it not simplify life if the term fedora.us were dropped? (2) I gather that Livna is compatible (or almost compatible?) with the official Fedora repositories ? So one might call Livna "Fedora Extra Extra" ? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
