Re: up2date GPG failures

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: up2date GPG failures
• From: "Amadeus W. M." <amadeus84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:16:07 -0400
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Sender: news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.)

> The bug is that up2date is reporting a misleading error message, which 
> should be "unknown signature" rather than "unsigned package".
> 
> Fix:
> # rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora
> 
> Paul.

well, it'd be good if the correct signature would be imported during the
configuration/registration process.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: up2date GPG failures
    • From: Paul Howarth

• References:
  • up2date GPG failures
    • From: Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
  • Re: up2date GPG failures
    • From: Paul Howarth

• Prev by Date: Re: incompatible postgresql data base files after update from FC3 to FC4
• Next by Date: Re:[SOLVED]Very strange wireless problem on Toshiba laptop with FC4
• Previous by thread: Re: up2date GPG failures
• Next by thread: Re: up2date GPG failures
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread