Re: GPG unsigned packages in FC4

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: GPG unsigned packages in FC4
From: "Amadeus W. M." <amadeus84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:52:31 -0400
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.)

> Are they building the old buggy version (jokingly marked "stable") or
> the later versions?

Bugs? What bugs? I'd be happy with any pan.

References:
- GPG unsigned packages in FC4
  - From: Amadeus W. M.
- Re: GPG unsigned packages in FC4
  - From: Michael A. Peters
- Re: GPG unsigned packages in FC4
  - From: Amadeus W. M.
- Re: GPG unsigned packages in FC4
  - From: Alan