On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:27 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Zing wrote: > > >After an upgrade to FC4 from FC3, there were some packages from FC3 still > >installed like: > > > >netpbm-10.27-4.FC3 > >xloadimage-4.1-34.FC3 > >vixie-cron-4.1-33_FC3 > >netpbm-progs-10.27-4.FC3 > >ImageMagick-6.2.2.0-2.fc3 > > > >The version-release is greater than the FC4 release package... > > > >This doesn't seem right? right? Is it worth reporting these in bugzilla > >or is this not a problem in practice? > > > >zing > > > > > > > It should be reported in bugzilla especially if the packages arent working. I noticed this too, but forgot to bugzilla it. IIRC the FC4 packages were missing the ".FC4" tag in the release, e.g. netpbm-10.27-4 instead of netpbm-10.27-4.FC4, hence the FC4 package is "older" than netpbm-10.27-4.FC3 and doesn't get upgraded. A quick scan through the package lists for FC3+updates and FC4 should reveal the cases this applies to. Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
