Re: :( FC4 missing apps

• To: frank@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: :( FC4 missing apps
• From: Garry Harthill <gazzerh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:59:43 +0100
• Cc:
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XYSnB3f4bfFUs2lW+cb+kB/StOM/JDW51heUIxBVlh92+ZRRkDwiOO1Lp3scZ13EEYPDSe046909ESZXGOyfQK1sdznMRLbhWhhuF6Duky163Wkm2RZUGrwqcyjbwq3Z4VvqeKLLeN8BidXArZ2MegVjQVxrHL+yUwLpv6LryHY=
• In-reply-to: <1118860487.3343.1.camel@serenity>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <1118860487.3343.1.camel@serenity>
• Reply-to: Garry Harthill <gazzerh@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 15/06/05, Frank Pineau <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *sob*
> No checkinstall, no mplayer, Evo is crazy flaky, etc.
> 
> Anyone have a decent checkinstall alternative?  I can obviously compile
> software like mplayer from source, but I'd prefer to have it installed
> as an RPM, and checkinstall doesn't seem to want to work under FC4.

FC3 RPMs for mplayer work fine.

• References:
  • :( FC4 missing apps
    • From: Frank Pineau

• Prev by Date: RE: how can you verify that the site you get is not a fake?
• Next by Date: Re: 2 computer network from Wi-Fi
• Previous by thread: Re: :( FC4 missing apps
• Next by thread: Problems starting samba
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread