Am Do, den 16.06.2005 schrieb Truls Gulbrandsen um 19:32: > please, can someone tell me; is the following yum.conf also good for FC4? > > http://www.fedorafaq.org/samples/yum.conf > Truls Gulbrandsen I was never a fan of that monolithic yum.conf style (Max, please forgive me :) I know the reason why you are publishing it this way). I heartily recommend to create separate repo files below /etc/yum.repos.d/. And further, some things changed. So at least I see the repository structure is actually different to whats in the FAQ yum.conf. With other words: do not use the yum.conf as it is there, but try to understand what it intends and I am sure you will learn some nice things from it. Also have in mind that mixing repositories can lead to some frustration (we read about package collisions here on the list frequently); though many repositories are disabled in the FAQ yum.conf. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp Serendipity 17:43:37 up 23 days, 16:21, load average: 0.23, 0.12, 0.10
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
