Am Do, den 16.06.2005 schrieb Matthew Miller um 0:42: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:04:52AM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > That didn't change with FC4. I suggest to install rpm-devel too. > > You shouldn't need rpm-devel unless you're actually writing or compiling > programs which make rpm library calls -- package manager meta-stuff. > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Thank you Matthew for having an open eye :) In fact I did not mean rpm-devel, but redhat-rpm-config to have debuginfo packages and debug coded stripped binary rpms from an rpmbuild process. Sorry for confusing. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp Serendipity 00:48:26 up 22 days, 23:26, load average: 0.14, 0.16, 0.19
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
