Re: OT: perl vs shell cmd

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: OT: perl vs shell cmd
• From: Dave Mitchell <davem@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:01:06 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:14:16PM +0700, Beast wrote:
> Supose I want to parse a big log file (~500MB/4mil lines), which one is 
> faster and use less memory:

why don't try them both and time them?

-- 
Any [programming] language that doesn't occasionally surprise the
novice will pay for it by continually surprising the expert.
   -- Larry Wall

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OT: perl vs shell cmd
    • From: Ben Steeves

• References:
  • OT: perl vs shell cmd
    • From: Beast

• Prev by Date: Re: LDAP authentication on FC3
• Next by Date: Re: Trying to write iso images to CD
• Previous by thread: OT: perl vs shell cmd
• Next by thread: Re: OT: perl vs shell cmd
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread