Re: Setting up named as secondary

[Dan Trainor <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark wrote:
> Damn, I found it: I only have UDP but no TCP open for port 53.... That's when using the official IPs. So that works now.
>
> The VPN IPs still don't work, although those go through a cipe tunnel and should not get blocked by the firewall.
> Ssh works too without problems, so why not named?
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
> > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:04 PM
> > To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> > Subject: Re: Setting up named as secondary
> >
> >
> > Am Sa, den 11.06.2005 schrieb Mark um 0:46:
> >
> >
> > > I have a master and secondary DNS server. The secondary 
> >
> > tries to do a 
> >
> > > zone-transfer from the master, but reports a connection refused. 
> > > However, the master claims it approved the transfer.
> >
> > > The master configuration file is:
> >
> > > zone "my-domain.com" {
> > >        notify no;
> > >        type slave;
> > >        file "pz/named.<MY_DOMAIN>.com";
> > >        masters { 192.168.1.136; };
> > > };
> >
> > Paste error? Saying it is the master and the zone definition 
> > does not match.
> >
> > Side note: if you are running bind chrooted the slave zone 
> > files have to be located into the slaves directory.
> >
> >
> > > MARK
> >
> > Alexander

Mark -

If you don't mind me asking (and I just got done restoring my stuff, so 
forgive me for not having on-site archives to re-read your origional 
post), which distribution of BIND did you use?  Did you roll y our own, 
or did you use Fedora's RPM?

Thanks
-dant