Re: Setting up named as secondary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark wrote:
Damn, I found it: I only have UDP but no TCP open for port 53.... That's when using the official IPs. So that works now.

The VPN IPs still don't work, although those go through a cipe tunnel and should not get blocked by the firewall.
Ssh works too without problems, so why not named?



-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:04 PM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Setting up named as secondary



Am Sa, den 11.06.2005 schrieb Mark um 0:46:


I have a master and secondary DNS server. The secondary

tries to do a


zone-transfer from the master, but reports a connection refused. However, the master claims it approved the transfer.

The master configuration file is:

zone "my-domain.com" {
       notify no;
       type slave;
       file "pz/named.<MY_DOMAIN>.com";
       masters { 192.168.1.136; };
};

Paste error? Saying it is the master and the zone definition does not match.


Side note: if you are running bind chrooted the slave zone files have to be located into the slaves directory.


MARK

Alexander


Mark -

If you don't mind me asking (and I just got done restoring my stuff, so forgive me for not having on-site archives to re-read your origional post), which distribution of BIND did you use? Did you roll y our own, or did you use Fedora's RPM?

Thanks
-dant


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux