On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:03:24PM -0500, Wang, Liqin wrote: > Could anyone give me some info about whether fedora 2.4.22-1.2199.nptlsmp > supports the server with four processors and overall 16 GB RAM? If not, > which version should be used? Thanks for all advices on this issure. I do want to upgrade to a new version, but not sure if this will solve my problem. The current system is not stable. It hungs once a while when it runs a user app which frequently reads and writes files from and into a nfs mounted server. I did another test to run a program which kept allocating memory without releasing them back. After about 3.2 GB mem allocated, the kernel stopped allocating the mem, but it did not kill the program. However, the same version of kernel installed in a box with one processor, after running my test program, the kernel automatically killed the program when there is no more memory available to allocate. Thanks, wang > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [SMTP:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 3:51 PM > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 51 > > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Adding a new hard drive to LVM (Paul Howarth) > 2. RE: tcp/routing question... (bruce) > 3. Re: Disable Middle mouse button? (Tony Nelson) > 4. Re: dump a package list (Arthur Pemberton) > 5. Re: Adding a new hard drive to LVM (Derek Scollon) > 6. Re: Adding a new hard drive to LVM (Derek Scollon) > 7. Re: What repository to choose + kernel backwards > compatibility (Alexander Dalloz) > 8. Re: How to clear log files? (Alexander Dalloz) > 9. Problem installing eGott on FC 2 (Jon Ingason) > 10. large server (Wang, Liqin) > 11. Re: What repository to choose + kernel backwards > compatibility (Andy Pieters) > 12. Re: Problem installing eGott on FC 2 (Alexander Dalloz) > 13. Re: large server (Matthew Miller) > 14. Re: large server (Alexander Dalloz) > 15. Re: tcp/routing question... (Felipe Alfaro Solana) > 16. No regression line formulas in Office.org calc (Major Seery) > 17. Re: large server (Andy Pieters) > 18. Re: large server (Matthew Miller) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:10:44 +0100 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Adding a new hard drive to LVM > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1118171444.13644.421.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:35 +0100, Derek Scollon wrote: > > I'm running FC3 and currently have one 300GB SATA drive which looks like this. > > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > > /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 > > 286285288 239994144 31748708 89% / > > /dev/sda1 101086 33733 62134 36% /boot > > none 517796 0 517796 0% /dev/shm > > > > I've added a second drive today and am following the instructions here... > > > > http://www.hants.lug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?action=browse&id=LinuxHints/LogicalVolumeManagement&oldid=LogicalVolumeManagement (section titled "Adding another disk") > > > > ...to add this drive to the volume group. I've successfully got as far as step 5 and hit a problem, since trying to unmount that volume group tells me that > / is in use. Trying step 6 warns me that running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem can cause severe damage, at which point I chicken out. Is it safe to skip to s> tep 7 and run resize2fs without unmounting the filesystem first or should I be doing something different?> > > This may or may not work, but it's safe and it'll just refuse to do it > if it can't: > > # ext2online /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 > > You don't need to unmount the partition; in fact it won't work if you > do. > > This assumes you're using an ext2 or ext3 filesystem. > > Paul. > -- > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:15:08 -0700 > From: "bruce" <bedouglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: tcp/routing question... > To: "'For users of Fedora Core releases'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <121e01c56b95$38cbb2e0$0301a8c0@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > you're a sicccckk dude!!! > > funny, but sick! > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Andy Green > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:07 PM > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > Subject: Re: tcp/routing question... > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > bruce wrote: > | which is what i've been driving at... > | > | which i'm also believing is a reasonably good sized market... particularly > | if you can get homeland security to buy into the fact that terrorists are > | making $$$ with phishing/pharming scams!! > | > | you see matt, i've never looked at this as a purely tech issue with the > | underlying protocols... but you need some way for the avg user to > really be > | able to tell.. that the site he's on, is the one he should be on.. in a > | similar vein.. you need to be able to do the same thing from the > server side > | as well... > > This reminds me of a Phil Dick short story. Aliens have been attacking > and eating people on Earth spaceships! They seem to operate some kind > of mind control once you get close enough to an alien ship, the Earth > folk on the ship just drive right up to the Aliens and pour tomato > ketchup over themselves. > > The technical guys back on Earth create an Alien Mind Control detector > and send a guy out on a ship to find some aliens to test it. Sure > enough he's zooming around and Bruurp! Bruurp! Bruuup!!! the Alien > Mind Control detector starts flashing away and filling the ship with its > hooting. However our hero is under... yes... Alien Mind Control and as > far as he can tell the detector is reporting he is safe as he drives > right up to the Aliens holding a bowl of salad. > > - -Andy > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCpfBqjKeDCxMJCTIRAsAxAJ0UxRUpddfwMkEGN6nim72I5TePMgCfe2Bl > VTxLyNlZCsUyj2sl1ICRszU= > =6CT3 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:15:10 -0400 > From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Disable Middle mouse button? > To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <v04020a01becb96e1ae32@[192.168.123.162]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > At 3:28 PM +1000 6/7/05, Steffen Kluge wrote: > > >On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 01:00 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote: > >> I've since put everything back and I'm back where I started. > > > >If you want to retain scrolling, but disable middle-button clicking, you > >could just map button 2 (middle) out of the way. > > > >If you use xmodmap -pp without any re-mappings in place you probably get > >something like: > > > > There are 7 pointer buttons defined. > > > > Physical Button > > Button Code > > 1 1 > > 2 2 > > 3 3 > > 4 4 > > 5 5 > > 6 6 > > 7 7> > > > > > >Swapping button 2 with button 7 (which is unused) should disable > >middle-click: xmodmap -e "pointer = 1 7 3 4 5 6 2" while retaining wheel > >functionality. If you're happy with this you can put it into the X init > >file of your choice. > > > >Cheers > >Steffen. > > Aha! Thank you, that seems to do the trick. apropos mouse didn't find > xmodmap for me because xmodmap talks about "pointers". > > Actually, xmodmap says I have only 5 pointer buttons, but I mapped 2 to 7 > anyway. :) I chose to put it into /exc/X11/Xmodmap (seems logical) for > everyone (well, just me, really). > > > At 3:35 PM +1000 6/7/05, Steffen Kluge wrote: > > >> There are 7 pointer buttons defined. > > > >Sorry for replying to myself, I forgot to add: in case you only see 5 > >buttons here you need to add an extra (unused) button by increasing the > >"Buttons" option in the "InputDevice" section in xorg.conf. > > I don't seem to have to change that. > ____________________________________________________________________ > TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:13:33 -0400 > From: Arthur Pemberton <dalive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: dump a package list > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42A5E3CD.4030605@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Eric Persson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to dump a package list, and then take the list and use > > as a package-list-template on a new server? > > > > I've thought about it and I'm unsure if the order of the packages on > > the list would matter since, packages in the beginning might depend on > > the ones at the end, and if so they would fail to install and give an > > even messier dependency problem. > > > > Is a rpm -qa >package_list sufficient? How should I then proceed to > > install the packages on the list? > > > > > > Best regards, > > Eric > > > You may want to take a look at Kickstart (included with FC): > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.3-Manual/custom-guide/ch-kickstart2.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:40:34 +0100 > From: Derek Scollon <mailing.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Adding a new hard drive to LVM > To: Markku Kolkka <markkuk@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1716764388.20050607204034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > Derek Scollon kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 7. > > kesäkuuta 2005 21:35): > >> Trying > >> step 6 warns me that running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem > >> can cause severe damage, at which point I chicken out. Is it > >> safe to skip to step 7 and run resize2fs without unmounting > >> the filesystem first > > > It's "safe" because resize2fs notices that the filesystem is > > mounted and refuses to do anything :-) > > >> or should I be doing something different? > > > You must boot the system from a rescue CD so that you can work > > without mounting your normal root filesystem. > > > -- > > Markku Kolkka > > markku.kolkka@xxxxxx > > > For some reason this didn't work as planned. Booting from the rescue CD came to a final step for either mounting the filesystems or not. Mounting them resulted in not being able to unmount them again (in use) and not mounting them in the first place did not show VolGroup00 in /dev at all. I solved it using the ext2online command.> > > -- > Derek > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:41:34 +0100 > From: Derek Scollon <mailing.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Adding a new hard drive to LVM > To: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <722584532.20050607204134@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:35 +0100, Derek Scollon wrote: > >> I'm running FC3 and currently have one 300GB SATA drive which looks like this. > >> > >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > >> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 > >> 286285288 239994144 31748708 89% / > >> /dev/sda1 101086 33733 62134 36% /boot > >> none 517796 0 517796 0% /dev/shm > >> > >> I've added a second drive today and am following the instructions here... > >> > >> http://www.hants.lug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?action=browse&id=LinuxHints/LogicalVolumeManagement&oldid=LogicalVolumeManagement > >> (section titled "Adding another disk") > >> > >> ...to add this drive to the volume group. I've successfully got > >> as far as step 5 and hit a problem, since trying to unmount that > >> volume group tells me that / is in use. Trying step 6 warns me that > >> running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem can cause severe damage, at > >> which point I chicken out. Is it safe to skip to step 7 and run > >> resize2fs without unmounting the filesystem first or should I be > >> doing something different? > > > This may or may not work, but it's safe and it'll just refuse to do it > > if it can't: > > > # ext2online /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 > > > You don't need to unmount the partition; in fact it won't work if you > > do. > > > This assumes you're using an ext2 or ext3 filesystem. > > > Paul. > > -- > > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > This worked perfectly, thanks. Churned away on the hard drives for 5 minutes or so and ended up with one volume 44% full, as expected. > > -- > Derek > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:44:33 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: What repository to choose + kernel backwards > compatibility > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1118173473.18979.81.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Am Di, den 07.06.2005 schrieb Andy Pieters um 21:04: > > > What repository should I shoose for rhn-applet-gui and for up2date? It keeps > > on giving 404 errors right now. > > A mirror or more near your location. > > > Also, where do I set those. > > http://www.fedoranews.org/contributors/alexander_dalloz/mirror > > > On another note, I have a FC3 production server and I am interested in > > upgrading its kernel. However I see that yum 'suggests' a FC4 kernel. Is it > > able to run on FC4? > > Sure you did not enable the development repo? Beware to NOT do so! Hope > you haven't already populated your server with rawhide/development > stuff. > > > Andy > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp > Serendipity 21:41:53 up 14 days, 20:19, load average: 0.17, 0.11, 0.09 > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050607/f1d59fe2/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8> > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 2> 1:49:35 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: How to clear log files? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1118173775.18979.87.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Am Di, den 07.06.2005 schrieb Frank Chen um 20:57: > > > How do I clear the log files in /var/log? > > Please stop hijacking foreign threads. Means, you are replying to former > thread by starting a new topic. You even now double hijacked. Your > question and the other one ("initrd question") are part of "Squirrelmail > and HTTP". Don't wonder if you get no answers. > > Why do you want to "clear" the logs? What do you mean with it? You want > to zero the current log files or throw away the rotated (those with > .<number> suffix)? > > You may move the old, rotated logs to a different place. If you really > think you need to empty a current log file, then don't simply delete it > but run "> file.log" to zero it. > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp > Serendipity 21:45:16 up 14 days, 20:22, load average: 0.07, 0.11, 0.09 > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050607/2769a424/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:49:58 +0200 > From: Jon Ingason <Jon.Ingason@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Problem installing eGott on FC 2 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42A5FA66.3070907@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > I am traying to install eGott on FC 2. I have following: > > MySQL-shared-4.1.10-0 > MySQL-client-4.1.10-0 > MySQL-server-4.1.10-0 > MySQL-shared-compat-4.1.10-0 > MySQL-devel-4.1.10-0 > httpd-2.0.51-2.9 > id3lib-3.8.3-1 > > When I try to install egott-0.1-1.i386.rpm I get unresolved > dependancy: > libid3-3.8.so.0 needs by egott-0.1-1 > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 needs by egott-0.1-1 > > This seems odd, so I try to compile eGott from the source: > > [jonsi@hobbe egott-0.1]$ ./configure --with-mysql=/usr --prefix=/usr > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > ... > ... > ... > checking mysql.h usability... yes > checking mysql.h presence... yes > checking for mysql.h... yes > checking for mysql_affected_rows in -lmysqlclient... no > configure: error: "mysqlclient library is required" > > This seems also odd or is it? > > --Jon > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:03:24 -0500 > From: "Wang, Liqin" <Wang.Liqin@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: large server > To: "'fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <3BA778EB31BBD711AAE00002B33B604A5631A5@EXCSRV06> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi, > Could anyone give me some info about whether fedora 2.4.22-1.2199.nptlsmp supports the server with four processors and overall 16 GB RAM? If not, which version should be used? > > Thanks, > > wang > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:05:38 +0200 > From: Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: What repository to choose + kernel backwards > compatibility > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200506072205.38470.mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 21:44, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > > Sure you did not enable the development repo? Beware to NOT do so! Hope > > you haven't already populated your server with rawhide/development> > > stuff. > > > No fear there... no automatic updator running on the server. I always test > updates before applying them on the server. > > Thanks for the article. That explains it really wel. > > How about the second part of the question? > > Can I run a FC4 kernel on a FC3 box? > > Kind regards > > > Andy > > > > Alexander > > -- > Registered Linux User Number 379093 > -- --BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GAT/O/>E$ d-(---)>+ s:(+)>: a--(-)>? C++++$(+++) UL++++>++++$ P-(+)>++ > L+++>++++$ E---(-)@ W+++>+++$ !N@ o? !K? W--(---) !O !M- V-- PS++(+++) > PE--(-) Y+ PGP++(+++) t+(++) 5-- X++ R*(+)@ !tv b-() DI(+) D+(+++) G(+) > e>++++$@ h++(*) r-->++ y--()>++++ > -- ---END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > -- > Check out these few php utilities that I released > under the GPL2 and that are meant for use with a > php cli binary: > > http://www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ > -- > > -- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 22:10:14 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Problem installing eGott on FC 2 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1118175014.18979.95.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Am Di, den 07.06.2005 schrieb Jon Ingason um 21:49: > > > I am traying to install eGott on FC 2. I have following: > > > > MySQL-shared-4.1.10-0 > > MySQL-client-4.1.10-0 > > MySQL-server-4.1.10-0 > > MySQL-shared-compat-4.1.10-0 > > MySQL-devel-4.1.10-0 > > httpd-2.0.51-2.9 > > id3lib-3.8.3-1 > > > > When I try to install egott-0.1-1.i386.rpm I get unresolved > > dependancy: > > libid3-3.8.so.0 needs by egott-0.1-1 > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 needs by egott-0.1-1 > > > > This seems odd, so I try to compile eGott from the source: > > Not odd, you just have to understand how RPM works. > You have id3lib installed but obviously it does not provide the needed > libid3-3.8.so.0, but certainly a different version. You can check > yourself with "rpm -ql id3lib". > Second, you don't have compat-libstdc++ installed. Learn to use the > tools on board: yum provides libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 > > > [jonsi@hobbe egott-0.1]$ ./configure --with-mysql=/usr --prefix=/usr > > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > > ... > > ... > > ... > > checking mysql.h usability... yes > > checking mysql.h presence... yes > > checking for mysql.h... yes > > checking for mysql_affected_rows in -lmysqlclient... no > > configure: error: "mysqlclient library is required" > > > > This seems also odd or is it? > > No, not at all. You have to tell configure where it can find > libmysqlclient.so. > > > --Jon > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp > Serendipity 22:04:10 up 14 days, 20:41, load average: 0.08, 0.07, 0.08 > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050607/0b393b34/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:12:28 -0400 > From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: large server > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20050607201228.GA22108@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:03:24PM -0500, Wang, Liqin wrote: > > Could anyone give me some info about whether fedora 2.4.22-1.2199.nptlsmp > > supports the server with four processors and overall 16 GB RAM? If not, > > which version should be used? > > I believe we call that a "medium-small server" these days. :)> > > Kernel 2.4.22 sounds like Fedora Core 1, which is basically history. I'd > suggest waiting a week and installing Fedora Core 4. Either one should work, > though. > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 22:13:18 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: large server > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1118175197.18979.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Am Di, den 07.06.2005 schrieb Wang, Liqin um 22:03: > > > Could anyone give me some info about whether fedora 2.4.22-1.2199.nptlsmp supports the > > server with four processors and overall 16 GB RAM? If not, which version should be used? > > > wang > > You better do not use legacy Fedora Core 1 (btw. the named kernel has > security issues and there is a newer one by FLP). Wait a few days and > install upcoming (Monday 13th) FC4. If you won't handle short lifetime > cycles, then you are better by using RHEL4 (or clone). > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp > Serendipity 22:10:39 up 14 days, 20:48, load average: 0.32, 0.20, 0.12 > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050607/cb5b9e12/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:13:52 +0200 > From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe.alfaro@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: tcp/routing question... > To: bedouglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <6f6293f105060713134f69b8ab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 6/7/05, bruce <bedouglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > matt... > > > > if i understand them both, ssl/ipsec are essentially the same thing, ie the > > ability to create a secure connection between two points... > > No... SSL operates at a higher level in the TCP/IP protocol stack. To > be more concrete, SSL is an application-level protocol, whereas IPSec > operates at the network level. IPSec can be configured to set up an > encrypted and/or authenticated link between two peers, or in tunnel > mode, where IP datagrams coming from several client machines get > multiplexed, encapsulated, encrypted and/or authenticated, then sent > over a "tunnel" over a public IP network to the tunnel endpoint, where > the process is reversed and the decapsulated packet delivered to its > target. > > SSL is an application service, and end-to-end encrypted/authenticated > link between application peers and thus, the protocol or application > must explicitly support it (although there are tricks like using > stunnel). IPSec encrypts/authenticates a whole link (or parts of a > link) and it's application transparent: you can implement an > IPSec-protected link and have SSL-unfriendly or SSL-disabled > applications or protocols get automatic encryption/authentication via > IPSec features. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:33:33 -0600 > From: Major Seery <mseery@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: No regression line formulas in Office.org calc > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20050607142559.023f8b60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > I'm new to Linux and am generally impressed, but disappointed that when you > > create an > xy chart in calc, you can plot a regression curve but cannot get > the formula for the curve, as you can with Microsoft Excel or Lotus. Am I > missing something, or does anyone know another Linux program that will do > this? I frequently need this in my work. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:46:27 +0200 > From: Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: large server > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200506072246.27308.mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 22:13, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > You better do not use legacy Fedora Core 1 (btw. the named kernel has > > security issues and there is a newer one by FLP). Wait a few days and > > install upcoming (Monday 13th) FC4. > > > Without criticising the good work of Fedora, I personally thing it is not a > very good idea to install a new release version on a production server. Why > not installing Fedora Core 3 which is currently mature. > > After a few months it would be small work to upgrade to a more mature Fedora > Core 4 > > With kind regards > > > Andy > > -- > Registered Linux User Number 379093 > -- --BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GAT/O/>E$ d-(---)>+ s:(+)>: a--(-)>? C++++$(+++) UL++++>++++$ P-(+)>++ > L+++>++++$ E---(-)@ W+++>+++$ !N@ o? !K? W--(---) !O !M- V-- PS++(+++) > PE--(-) Y+ PGP++(+++) t+(++) 5-- X++ R*(+)@ !tv b-() DI(+) D+(+++) G(+) > e>++++$@ h++(*) r-->++ y--()>++++ > -- ---END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > -- > Check out these few php utilities that I released > under the GPL2 and that are meant for use with a > php cli binary: > > http://www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ > -- > > -- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:50:19 -0400 > From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: large server > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20050607205019.GA24017@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:46:27PM +0200, Andy Pieters wrote: > > > You better do not use legacy Fedora Core 1 (btw. the named kernel has > > > security issues and there is a newer one by FLP). Wait a few days and > > > install upcoming (Monday 13th) FC4. > > Without criticising the good work of Fedora, I personally thing it is not > > a very good idea to install a new release version on a production server. > > Why not installing Fedora Core 3 which is currently mature. > > If you're gonna go with Fedora, might as well go with Fedora Core 4, because > it's the current focus of developer attention. If you're concerned about > stability of a production server, go CentOS instead. > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > Current office temperature: 81 degrees Fahrenheit. > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 51 > *******************************************
