Re: Anybody got experience with libvisual?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anybody got experience with libvisual?
From: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:02:06 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:14 +0200, Andy Pieters wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I was wondering if anyone managed to compile the packages 
> libvisual-nebulus-0.1.4 or libvisual-gforce-0.1.0 with taglib version 0.2.0 ?
> 
> They all complain that taglib version requested is 0.1.6 or 0.1.7.
> 
> Aren't upgrades suposed to be 'backwards-compatible'? 

No. Not always.

References:
- Anybody got experience with libvisual?
  - From: Andy Pieters

Prev by Date: Re: how can you verify that the site you get is not a fake?
Next by Date: RE: how can you verify that the site you get is not a fake?
Previous by thread: Anybody got experience with libvisual?
Next by thread: Need advice on new mailserver and spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]