The situation with libwww.
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Fedora Development List <
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>,
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: The situation with libwww.
From
: Sam Varshavchik <
mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 15:31:33 -0400
Cc
:
List-archive
: <
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list
>
List-help
: <
mailto:
[email protected]
?subject=help
>
List-id
: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post
: <
mailto:
[email protected]
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>, <
mailto:
[email protected]
?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>, <
mailto:
[email protected]
?subject=unsubscribe
>
Reply-to
: For users of Fedora Core releases <
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
W3C stopped maintaining libwww three years ago (
http://www.w3.org/Library/
). So, what should one do after finding a bunch of major, but non-security related flaws in libwww?
Attachment:
pgpShmzRbd0HS.pgp
Description:
PGP signature
Follow-Ups
:
Re: The situation with libwww.
From:
Andy Green
Prev by Date:
Re: FC3: ClamAV MIlter
Next by Date:
Re: The situation with libwww.
Previous by thread:
FC3: ClamAV MIlter
Next by thread:
Re: The situation with libwww.
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Current Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[KDE Users]
[Fedora Tools]
[Fedora Docs]