Re: memory.c - bad pmd - x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:50:25AM +0200, Christoph Franke wrote:
 > Dave Jones - Tue, May 31 2005 19:16:34 -0400:
 > 
 > > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:30:43PM +0200, Christoph Franke wrote:
 > >  > Dave Jones - Tue, May 24 2005 12:57:15 -0400:
 > >  > 
 > >  > > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:02:40AM -0700, Peter J. Stieber wrote:
 > >  > >  > DJ = Dave Jones
 > >  > >  > DJ> Hrmph. No, I screwed up the patch.
 > >  > >  > DJ> -29 is rebuilding, it'll appear in the FC3/ subdir of my
 > >  > >  > DJ> people page a little while after its done building.
 > >  > >  > 
 > >  > >  > here's what I get with 2.6.11-1.29_FC3smp.
 > >  > >  > 
 > >  > >  > May 24 06:55:43 maggie kernel: collect2:5519 free pmd ffff8100777f1000 
 > >  > >  > freed by 0xffffffffffffffff
 > >  > >  > May 24 06:55:43 maggie kernel: mm/memory.c:109: bad pmd 
 > >  > >  > ffff8100777f1000(0000000000000064).
 > >  > 
 > >  > [snip]
 > >  > 
 > >  > I noticed a -30 build on your webspace at people.redhat.com. Is this
 > >  > based on 2.6.11.11, and does it nail the bad pmd bug?
 > > 
 > > No idea yet, you tell me :)
 > 
 > Ok :-) But could you tell us if you already based this one upon
 > 2.6.11.11, which contains some x86_64 fixes?

Yes, it does include 2.6.11.11

		Dave


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux