--- jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 06 May 2005 04:42 pm, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:40:23PM -0700, Charles > Li wrote: > > > Which is better for slow machine? > > > > Basically, "neither". You're really askin' for a > religious flame war here, > > but both KDE and GNOME are very full-featured and > complicated desktop > > environments. For an older/slower machine, I'd > suggest something more > > bare-bones instead. XFCE, or just plain Window > Maker or Fluxbox. > > > > -- > > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx > <http://www.mattdm.org/> > > Boston University Linux ------> > <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit. > > I agree on all points. Also an old box - - what > flavor?? > > I run a 800 Mhz Athlon with 512 MB using KDE quite > comfortabally. > A 300 Mhz and 128MB might be another issue. > -- > John H Ludwig > > Common sense is so rare, why do they call it > common!!! > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > I am using a p2-mmx 400mhz __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
