Am Mo, den 02.05.2005 schrieb M E Fieu um 20:23: > Sorry, May be I am too greedy to know different > approach. If I can even allow sftp not disallow SSH, > that will be the best. I am looking into rssh. But I > seems to have problem understanding the installation. Maybe it's my lack of English, but is your sentence logical? "If I can even allow sftp not disallow SSH, that will be the best." - allow sftp and not disallow ssh => allow both sftp and ssh I guess the intention is to allow ftp and sftp, but to disallow ssh. > Sorry > > http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh/downloads.shtml > > I followed the link above and download the following > ddmkey.txt, rssh-2.2.3.tar.gz , rssh-2.2.3.tar.gz.sig > and rssh-2.2.3-1.src.rpm > > May I know what is each of them doing? I did the > following, it seems prompt me error. Where is public > key?? ddmkey.txt ?? Yes, and you imported that ddmkey.txt key file? > gpg --verify rssh-2.2.3.tar.gz.sig rssh-2.2.3.tar.gz > gpg: Signature made Saturday 15,January,2005 09:54:04 > PM SGT using DSA key ID DF > BEAD02 > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found $ LANG=C gpg --verify rssh-2.2.3.tar.gz.sig rssh-2.2.3.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 15 14:54:04 2005 CET using DSA key ID DFBEAD02 gpg: Good signature from "Derek D. Martin <ddm@xxxxxxxxxx>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: B5F7 DC7F F7B9 A9E2 5AE2 9002 1C49 C048 DFBE AD02 Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.14_FC2smp Serendipity 20:42:27 up 4:48, 19 users, 0.22, 0.75, 0.83
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
