Am Mo, den 25.04.2005 schrieb Ashley M. Kirchner um 21:40: > These days FC3 tells me that there's one update available, > kdeartwork. When I try to install it, it tells me that libGL.so is > needed. Problem is, it is installed. In two places, /usr/lib/ and 1) I don't see a kdeartwork update package actually. 2) Sure it requires libGL.so and not libGL.so.1? I would wonder if it is first as the .so files are needed for development. $ rpm -qp --requires kdeartwork-3.3.1-1.i386.rpm | grep libGL libGL.so.1 libGLU.so.1 > /usr/X11R6/lib/. What has me baffled though is that if I run this: > > rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libGL.so > > It tells me that file isn't owned by any packages. However, if I do Maybe coming from a third party graphics driver like NVidia or ATI? > this: > > rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 > > Then it tells me what provides it just fine. So, having those files > on the system, why does kdeartwork fail to update? Please be specific about which kdeartwork RPM you are speaking. > Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@xxxxxxxxxx> . 303.442.6410 x130 Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.14_FC2smp Serendipity 21:58:25 up 13 days, 18:38, load average: 0.85, 0.48, 0.33
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
