Re: multimedia licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, kwhiskers wrote:

So are you guys saying that this new/proposed (?) patent legislation in
Europa will force other distros to remove vital components from the standard
distibutions as well?

There is the potential for that yes.

On 4/17/05, kwhiskers <kwhiskers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have a question:

Many times I have heard that Fedora cannot be a fully functioning
operating system because of licensing constraints.

My question is:

Why are other distributions not plagued by these same constraints? They're
all Linux.

I have tried SuSE, Mandrake (now Mandrivel - such an unfortunate
christening), Knoppix, and some minor distros.


Fully functional in every respect that GPL code supports. What exactly is missing that makes Fedora non-functional? Java, Flash, MP3, DVD support are not shipped due to license/legal concerns but all are *readily* available from a variety of easily accessable locations e.g. livna.org <http://livna.org/>.
Why are other distributions not plagued by these same constraints? They're
all Linux.
Fedora has chosen to only include GPL code- anything else is excluded.
Some of the other distros are more cavalier in this respect.

--
Bests,
Jon

Every Linux distribution that ships only open source software and is
based on regions where software patents are enforced will be affected.

regards
Rahul


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux