Am So, den 10.04.2005 schrieb Loki Choggio um 18:06: > How to build latest n greatest Apache,PHP, OpenSSL > rpms? For what is it worth? Fedora is already leading edge. If not having the latest biggest version number of applications counts what? > Hi guys. The problem with Fedora/RedHat is their > insistence on using e.g Apache 2.0.46 or > openssl-0.9.7a-40.i386.rpm and then having everything > down that tree ie openssla.41 etc How do i go about > building my own rpm from the Apache 2.0.53 src from > httpd.apache.org? I know i would need a spec file but > can't proceed yet. http://www.gurulabs.com/goodies/guru+guides.php Study the RPM building if you really feel its worth the work. > For example while Apache 2.0.53 was released Fedora > didn't bother updating so the present 2.0.52 is > theoretically exploitable. For example php 4.3.11 came > out on March 31st but no updates are around the corner > Fedorawise. We know what happened with the holes in > php 4.3.9 and the exploits in existence. Security fixes are backported. Maybe you should read the RPMs changelogs. > I know someone will suggest using the development tree > packages but on FC3 they will break your system due to > the well known "dependency hell" problem as they beed > upgated glibc libcdst++ etc I doubt anyone will recommend using the development / rawhide tree for a system acting as a server system. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp Serendipity 18:10:10 up 11 days, 15:36, load average: 0.31, 0.24, 0.24
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
