Re: What is the official/semi-official positon of Fedora on KDE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Leaf wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2005 09:48, Claude Jones wrote:

Could you explain your last comment. I ran KDE 3.4 when I brought up a
new FC4t1 box. I couldn't find any remarkable differences between it and
my current implementation - I found a couple of annoyances, however. The
list of menu options had been cut way back, and even the Control Center
was not present as an option and had to be called up by a command. I'm
sure I missed things - from a read of the release notes, it seems like
many of the improvements had to with accessibility, and obviously for
those who need them, those features are extremely important. But, what
else has been improved?


That is all odd, my Kmenu options fill the screen and the Control Center has been there from the moment I installed. As an FYI I installed FC3 with none of the Gnome packages and all of the KDE (from the CDs). Then I updated everything, including KDesktop to 3.4. I haven't seen the issues you mention.


But you upgraded from the previous version. Mine was the default installation under FC4t1. I changed nothing during setup regarding KDE, except to choose it as my default desktop after FC4 was up and running. The issues I describe are how it came up under a default install - now granted, FC4t1 is what it is, and by final release, many things will change, including the issues I describe. Since you upgraded from a previous version, under FC3, your experience was different. But, my question is, what are the big improvements in KDE over the current version, apart from the accessibility improvements; the FC4 install issues are obviously not a proper subject here.


--
Claude Jones
Bluemont, VA, USA


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux