On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:59 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:01, Craig White wrote: > > > Lastly, and this is just an impression. I find it to be a repeated theme > > in your posts - that you have no hesitation to suggest that others go to > > great lengths to solve what appear to be gaps of the way things should > > be according to Les and I cannot see why you aren't involved in fedora- > > development list and making things happen. It seems all too easy to sit > > back and critique. > > Sorry, I'm just posting my observations. I did ramble on a bit too > much about it, but my only complaint is about continuing to distribute > known bugs (and then not liking the bug reports...). ---- but every release has known bugs - even updates that fix certain bugs contain other known bugs so the updates only fix specific known bugs and if you understand the theory behind Linux releases - I like to refer to Eric Raymond's 'the Cathedral and the Bazaar' - the point is to release early and often and have the community help identify and sometimes provide the solution to bugs. In short though - the reason that your desire about a 're-spin' of the ISO's is that all the known bugs aren't fixed - only some of them are fixed - and and this isn't about perfection, only advancement. You certainly are welcome to 're-spin' the core release yourself or organize a group of people to help if it seems important enough to do it. ---- > > > At least please recognize that this isn't the forum > > for accomplishing changes to the methodology and content of the Fedora > > core releases. > > I'm a user, posting my observations. Isn't this the list for users? ---- yeah and using this user list as a forum for fedora-development issues isn't as productive as pissing in the wind since pissing in the wind will at least empty your bladder. Craig
