On Apr 5, 2005 11:15 PM, Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 22:07 -0400, David Curry wrote: > > I thoroughly disagree with the notion that the decision to adopt > > Fedoraforum.org as a vehicle was unilateral or done without consultation. > > > > I don't. I agree with that. I would welcome some insight as to how you > feel that decision was bi- or multi-lateral, or how the *users* were > consulted. Right. There was no consultation. > > There was a rather extensive discussion several weeks back of the > > desirability of moving to a web interface for endusers. I found it an > > appalling idea at the time as list exchanges suggested to me that those > > subscribers possessing the technical skills to really help out endusers > > would be unlikely to populate the web interface subscriber group. I was > > also concerned by the general tone from many of the thread participants > > that endusers were really not welcome on fedora-list. > > > > May I ask where this discussion was held? I read darn near all of this > mailing list, and I particularly care about threads like that one, and I > do not recall much support for webfora on this list at all. The discussion was held here, on this list. See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&w=2&r=1&s=under+threat&q=b However, the common sense there was that most people *did not* want to move to web fora. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gustavo Seabra Graduate Student Chemistry Dept. Kansas State University Registered Linux user number 381680 ------------------------------------------------------------------ If at first you don't succeed... ...skydiving is not for you.
