Re: Security question

• To: Sasa Stupar <sasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Security question
• From: Terry Polzin <fox3ec208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:30:21 -0400
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <3479C36BD2BEA144224559B9@[192.168.10.249]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <3479C36BD2BEA144224559B9@[192.168.10.249]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Tuesday 05 April 2005 08:26 am, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I want to hear your opinion on the following net configurations:
> 1. cablemodem -> router -> server in DMZ
> 				-> LAN users
> 2. cablemodem -> router/server -> LAN users
>
> Which one is more secure and what are the risks on each one?
>
> Regards,
> Sasa
Option 1 is the way to go keep your server in a real DMZ off of your FW/router

• References:
  • Security question
    • From: Sasa Stupar

• Prev by Date: Re: xinetd.d listening twice on port 69
• Next by Date: Re: Anoying Peter Whalley Spam messages.
• Previous by thread: Re: Security question
• Next by thread: Re: Security question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread