Re: FC2 documentation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC2 documentation?
From: Pedro Fernandes Macedo <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:59:48 -0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Rob Rosenthal wrote:

Hi! I've heard it said that various FC releases are similar enough to various RHEL releases that the RHEL documentation can be used for the FC version. If this is true, which RHEL version is most analogous to FC2?
Thanks!

Most of the RHEL and RHL docs still work perfectly for fedora.. The only places where you'll notice changes are the parts related to sound (OSS being replaced by alsa) , the X server (mostly changes in the path of the config files) and some new features that werent available in RHEL 3 and RHL , like selinux , udev and hald , for example...

--
Pedro Macedo

References:
- FC2 documentation?
  - From: Rob Rosenthal

Prev by Date: Re: DOM implementation for Linux?
Next by Date: Badness in get_phy_reg at drivers/ieee1394/ohci1394.c:238
Previous by thread: FC2 documentation?
Next by thread: Re: FC2 documentation?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]