On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:29:07 -0500, Crisler, Jon <JCrisler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Personally, when dealing with very active lists and following the > thread, top posting is a time saver. I think this falls into the realm > of personal preference, some people like it, some not.... > Actually it is more commonly accepted that narrowing down the original message to only the relevant information, and then FOLLOWING that information with the new post is considered proper etiquette when participating in conversations on new groups. That being said, there are going to be people who top-post, and because of those people, there are going to be other people who will simply ignore them. > The information contained in this e-mail including any attachments may constitute Corvis Equipment Corporation Proprietary Information that is subject to Non-Disclosure Agreement and cannot be disclosed to any other party without the express consent of Corvis Corporation. > > If you are neither the intended recipient of this e-mail nor responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, note that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or retention of this e-mail is prohibited. > > If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, we request that you notify the sender by return e-mail and then delete this e-mail and any return email immediately. Funny, your disclaimer is longer than your message... and doesn't seem to make much sense. Also mail signatures should be separated from the original message. -- David Registered Linux User 383030 (since everyone else was doing it 8-) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary, and those who don't.
