Re: useing spamd instead of spamassassin, howto?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> [03-22-2005 19:22]:

> Greetings;
> 
> Because spamassassin seems to need a seperate invocation and 
> compilation by perl for each message handled, I was told that if I 
> switched to spamd that would fix much of that.

I think you want to run spamd/spamc instead of spamd/spamassassin.
Spamd is the daemon half of Spamassassin that needs to be running in the
background.  Upon message arrival, you want to invoke a child process of
spamc.

> 
> I have it running as a background process, and I've switch the kmail 
> filter to 'spamc -L', but in 6 hours, 99% of it has fallen right thru 
> to the default directory.
> 

I don't think -L is a valid switch for spamc.

> Somehow spamd doesn't seem to be running in the path the mail takes 
> when kmail fetches it from my isp, so how does one go about setting 
> up spamd to actually work?  I've read the man page without any lights 
> of comprehension comiing on.  A url with better docs, and examples of 
> howto for kmail integration would be very nice.
> 

Read up on the docs just a little more: http://spamassassin.apache.org/

-- 
Regards,
Matt Florido
Fedora Core Linux 2.6.10-1.770_FC3smp
19:43:16 up 5 days, load average: 0.23,0.29,0.12


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux