Am Mi, den 16.03.2005 schrieb William Hooper um 1:15: > >> 5. upgrade to whitebox linux which is a clone of RHEL3, which has > >> plenty of rpms out there for it, and not worry about it until Oct. 2008. > >> > > > > a) Whitebox Linux seems to be a dead project to me. The main guy behind it > > has turned over for CentOS. > > Considering a respin of WBEL was just released this week, you better check > your facts. > > William Hooper Hu! ;} Seems I mixed up whiteboxlinux.net with whiteboxlinux.org. One of the last days I saw on the CentOS website in it's FAQ http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=21 and concluded what I stated. So I seem to got to the wrong page and thinking wrong. Thank you William for pointing me to the true facts. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC2smp Serendipity 01:32:38 up 3 days, 4:05, load average: 0.26, 0.15, 0.10
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
