On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 17:50, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > > I did a test after purchasing my own wireless card. In downloading
> > > the same file from the same remote site with a wired and wireless
> > > machine. The wireless machine got 40K per second, while the wired
> > > machine got 8K per second.
> >
> > This is probably a temporary situation and will change as more
> > users start to share the wireless link.
> >
>
> Not likely, the 3 wireless DSL lines are totally separate from wired
> lan, so only internet traffic without having to go out to the ISP and
> back in thru the T-1 line. Classrooms are only hard-wired, so
> classrooms could only change by adding wireless cards, and would
> then lose access to local servers and printing,
I'd expect students to be using more of their own laptops with
wireless everywhere.
> > If your 4 class C's are adjacent and aligned on the right
> > bit-boundary they could be supernetted with a netmask
> > of 255.255.252.0. That won't help with internet access,
> > but machine<->machine communication would not need to
> > bounce though the router. I'd be surprised if that isn't
> > the case already.
> >
>
> 11001010.10000000.01000111.00000000
> 11001010.10000000.01001000.00000000
> 11001010.10000000.01001001.00000000
> 11001010.10000000.01001111.00000000
>
> Those are the 4 IP blocks. 71, 72, 73, and 79.
> It would take a mask of 240 to get them together I believe.
If they can't get something that simple right, and they put
a 10Meg router interface on the connect point, you have my
sympathy.
--
Les Mikesell
les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
