Am Mi, den 09.03.2005 schrieb rado um 14:30: > ok here are log statements from last activity in 10.0.0.12: > rom messages: last startup [ ... ] > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sendmail[2415]: sql_select option missing > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sendmail[2415]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism > available > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sendmail: sendmail startup succeeded > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sendmail: sm-client startup succeeded Check your Sendmail.conf for misconfiguration. > maillog > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sendmail[2411]: alias database /etc/aliases > rebuilt by root > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sendmail[2411]: /etc/aliases: 78 aliases, > longest 10 bytes, 802 bytes total > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sendmail[2416]: starting daemon (8.13.1): > SMTP+queueing@01:00:00 > Mar 9 12:34:17 rbmain2 sm-msp-queue[2425]: starting daemon (8.13.1): > queueing@01:00:00 > Mar 9 12:39:41 rbmain2 sendmail[3589]: j29Idc6D003589: > from=<rado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, size=305, class=0, nrcpts=1, > msgid=<1110393578.3563.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, proto=ESMTP, > daemon=MTA, relay=rbmain2.rivers-bend.com [10.0.0.12] > Mar 9 12:39:43 rbmain2 sendmail[3592]: j29Idc6D003589: > to=<radopowder@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ctladdr=<rado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (500/500), > delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=120305, > relay=mx2.hotmail.com. [65.54.166.230], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent ( > <1110393578.3563.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued mail for > delivery) > as the mail log showed, it sent a msg to my hotmail account, > radopowder@xxxxxxxxxxxx I went to that account and replied to that msg. > ...waited ample time for the msg to get back to rivers-bend.com and > never did. Now, while writing this msg, that reply shows up here on this > box. sigh Do you have a router / gateway or are hosts with IPs 10.0.0.10 and 10.0.0.12 connected directly to the net? Anyway, compare the 2 systems and where the IPs appear make sure they fit the situation which host is up and running. I don't think I can be helpful any further. What's needed is reading the configuration files and thinking about the setup. > incidently, to make it even more confusing, I'm gonna duck when I tell > y'all this, but my ip connection is NOT bridged...but PPPoE, granted, > normally there is no static ips w/a PPPoE connection but seeing that my > ISP and I have been knowing each other and have been friends since > before dirt. As a friend deal, he just guarantees me that it will be > static. But really, this has nothing to do w/the problem at hand. All in all this setup scenario sounds dubious to me. > john rose Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC2smp Serendipity 20:43:03 up 54 min, 16 average: 1.46, 0.41, 0.19
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
