On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:37:25 -0700, Charles Curley <charlescurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:04:40PM -0600, David Hoffman wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:23:28 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > This is because the tool handling the threading is using the References: > > > headers in the email to do it, rather than the naive Subject:-based > > > method used by the MARC-archives. > > > > > > > That's probably what gmail is basing theirs on as well. > > > > Looking at this thread and then the "changed" one... shows up as two > > different threads in gmail. > > Then gmail is broken, as I have suspected. I wonder what else is > broken about it? No, don't answer, I won't use gmail unless they fix > threading. > Again, this is a known issue in GMail. Look at: http://gmail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=8259&query=conversation+thread&topic=0&type=f&ctx=search They say they are 'working hard' to solve it, but they have been saying that for a while now, and I don't see any changes yet. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gustavo Seabra Graduate Student Chemistry Dept. Kansas State University Registered Linux user number 381680 ------------------------------------------------------------------ If at first you don't succeed... ...skydiving is not for you.
