On Tuesday 01 March 2005 11:34 am, David Hoffman wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:44:45 -0500, Carroll Grigsby <cgrigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> snip > > Also, you are mistaken about > > the archives. Both the MARC and Redhat archives *do* preserve threads. > > Are you sure about that? Take a closer look at MARC archives. What's > wrong with these threads? They only show the "SOLVED" part of the > thread, but dropped off what led up to the solution. Changing the > subject line made it start a new thread. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110931389000001&r=1&w=2 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110916514900004&r=1&w=2 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110910991400007&r=1&w=2 David: My bad about MARC preserving threads. As noted by others, RH's Fedora archives do preserve threading and that's a good thing. -- cmg
