nVidia or ATI?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: nVidia or ATI?
From: Steven Stern <subscribed-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:59:13 -0600
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

I'm about to buy a new desktop computer, probably a Dell Dimension 8400. The video options in my price range are

128MB PCI Express™ x16 (DVI/VGA/TV-out) ATI Radeon™ X300 SE or
256MB PCI Express™ x16 (DVI/VGA/TV-out) nVidia GeForce 6800

I see post after post about issues with nVidia cards. Is this still an issue with FC3? I'm not doing any gaming or advanced graphics, just general computer stuff. My goal is to have a quality video experience that works just as well in Linux as it does in Windows on the 17" ultrasharp monitor.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nVidia or ATI?
  - From: Michael A. Peters
- Re: nVidia or ATI?
  - From: Alexander Volovics
- Re: nVidia or ATI?
  - From: Jan Morales

Prev by Date: Re: Black Screen After YUM Update Revisited:
Next by Date: Re: Black Screen After YUM Update Revisited:
Previous by thread: How to list the LAN Card running config ?
Next by thread: Re: nVidia or ATI?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]