On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:20:58 -0600, Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 12:12 -0600, Bill Gradwohl wrote: > > Dave Pisarek wrote: > > > > >This is what I am receiving when installing FC3 on a Compaq Deskpro. > > >It occurs when I am asked to insert disk 2. I am verified the checksum > > >and also reburned cd2 at a slower speed. Does anyone have any ideas > > >and can it actually have been cd1 like in this thread: > > > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=134088 > > > > > >--Dave > > > > > > > > > > > According to the md5sum file I downloaded several months ago, the > > following are the checksums for the FC3 cd's: > > db8c7254beeb4f6b891d1ed3f689b412 FC3-i386-disc1.iso > > 2c11674cf429fe570445afd9d5ff564e FC3-i386-disc2.iso > > f88f6ab5947ca41f3cf31db04487279b FC3-i386-disc3.iso > > 6331c00aa3e8c088cc365eeb7ef230ea FC3-i386-disc4.iso > > > > The one mentioned in the URL is not amongst these. > > > Yeah, the FC3T2 CD had a different checksum than the release CD. > > Dave, > Try the checksum of all 4 CDs and the images to see if they match the > official checksums. It may be disk 1, it may be disk 2. > Some people had problems with disk1 especially when burning at default > speed but they worked when burned at 2X or 4X > > > -- > > Bill Gradwohl > > bill@xxxxxxx > > http://www.ycc.com > > spamSTOMPER Protected email > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Actually the checksums were correct as according to the release checksum. It was a bad burn on disk 1. I was able to get it installed with no issues there after but now need to deal with a POS video card that is causing display issues but that is for a different thread. Thanks all, -Dave
