On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 20:23 +0100, Mats Erlandson wrote: > The ifconfig output from 'problem' computer; > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:EA:5C:06:CF > inet addr:192.168.0.90 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:1194 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:399 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:304926 (297.7 KiB) TX bytes:46169 (45.0 KiB) > Interrupt:209 Base address:0xc000 > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:BA:BA:02:C6 > inet addr:192.168.0.91 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:864 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:275934 (269.4 KiB) TX bytes:812 (812.0 b) > Interrupt:169 Base address:0xb000 Is there any particular reason why you want to have two network cards on the same network? If you disable eth1 (ifdown eth1) does the machine work properly? Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
