Steven Pasternak wrote: > This is sort of out-of-the-blue, but I was just looking at RH6.2 and saw that > it (and maybe another) didn't ship with gcc, but with egcs. The command 'gcc' > is still there, though. What is the difference of gcc 2.7.x and egcs? Ancient GCC history, now. The "official" gcc was stagnating somewhat, and the developers were somewhat resistant to adopting patches from outside. The Experimental Gnu Compiler System was a forked project, aiming to improve matters. It proved successful enough that the two projects combined under the gcc name but with the EGCS code and maintainers. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EGCS and the overview to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_Collection : at time of writing, they provide good quick summaries. James. -- James Wilkinson | Anonymous: What do you think of Stainer's Exeter Devon UK | "Crucifixion"? E-mail address: james | Sir Thomas Beecham: Good idea! @westexe.demon.co.uk |
