On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 14:17 -0200, Leonardo Maguetas Devai wrote: > I have heard that OO is written in Java too! > And I believed, because OO is so damn slow indeed :( > If you believe OOo is written in Java it is easy to find out. Use the source Leonardo. I have not looked myself. > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:13 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "James Mckenzie" <jjmckenzie51@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "For users of Fedora Core > > releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:11 AM > > Subject: Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory! > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:57:11AM -0700, James Mckenzie wrote: > > >> > > > James Mckenzie wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I don't have those two options in jdk.config. I do find the following > > >> > options in cbulder.config: > > >> > > > >> > vmparam -Xms32m > > >> Minumum memory per load: 32MB > > >> > vmparam -Xmx256m > > >> Maximum memory per load: 256MB > > >> > > > >> > So I wonder why the JVM instance invoked by CBX takes up more than > > >> > 400mb memory? > > >> > > > >> This looks like a problem with either Java or Cbuilder and definately not > > >> LINUX or FC. > > >> > > > But I hear from the usual unreliable sources that OpenOffice is > > > written in Java. So if OpenOffice is part of Fedora it seems to me its > > > a Fedora problem also. There is no question in my experience that an > > > installation of everything thing in the FC3 (or even FC2) > > > distribution) leads to a bloated system. And saying XP systems after > > > SP2 are also bloated does not make me feel better. > > > > I haven't heard that OO is written in Java. Even if it is - one third-party > > application does not make the whole distro suck. > > > > Thomas > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
