Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
From: Ernie McCracken <holycrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:47:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:43:26AM -0800, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
> FC1 is "legacy" now, meaning that you'd be hard-pressed to find support
> for it.  You can still find it at (I think) http://legacy.fedora.org.  New

http://www.fedoralegacy.org/

References:
- Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
  - From: Rajev Mhasawade
- Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
  - From: Richard S. Crawford

Prev by Date: Re: 100% Linux - Is it possible?
Next by Date: Re: Could an Intel 486 wake up with FC3
Previous by thread: Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
Next by thread: Re: Is Fedora Core1 'tooo' old?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]