On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 09:24 -0600, linux.whiz@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:09:16 +0800, Edward Yang
<neo_in_matrix@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Okay, I found the anwser. The -Xmx option works. If I set it to -Xmx128,
> then the memory value drops to about 310mb; if I set it to-Xmx64m, then the
> memory value is about 250mb. I think it's CBX that is eating up too much
> memory.
So the issue is with your tool, not with the distribution then.
> I feel sorry that I think it help prove 'FC3 sucks' topic. :-(
Um, no - it helps prove that you *are* a troll. You've proven that it
is a software application which is not even included with the
distribution. It's your choice of tools (and your attitude) that
sucks, not FC3.
> This is the end of this topic for me.
Thank God. You've wasted enough of our time. Go away, troll.
HAH
