And I drily note that many of them seem to be nominally organic
computing units that have fallen slave to their minds' failure
to adapt and to failed habits.
{^_-} Joanne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scot L. Harris" <webid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 06:59, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
...
> > and continuing along this line, "your posting has been rejected by the
> > red hat mail system because it:
> >
> > 1) has a blank subject
> > 2) has a meaningless subject "HELP!!!" (that sort of thing)
> > 3) etc, etc, etc.
> >
> > i can't imagine this would be all that difficult. is there any reason
> > this can't be done?
> >
> > rday
> >
> > "this is the red hat mailing list auto-responder. our filtering
> > software has detected that you have responded by top posting rather
> > than bottom posting. your post has been rejected and, in addition,
> > guido and lorenzo will be by to see you later today to slap some sense
> > into you. have a nice day."
>
> Actually there seem to be any number of "auto-responders" when such
> messages are sent out. :)
>
>
> --
> Scot L. Harris
> webid@xxxxxxxxxx
